Forestry, pasture, agriculture and fauna correlated to recent changes in Sicily

Forest@ - Journal of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Volume 4, Pages 418-438 (2007)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/efor0495-0040418
Published: Dec 20, 2007 - Copyright © 2007 SISEF

Research Articles


Sicily, due to its position, dimension and variability may be considered representative of the environmental conditions and transformations occurred in the Mediterranean area. In some cases, transformation process was destructive for some habitats, as wetlands; their reclamation caused extinction of some bird species once breeding in Sicily. The transformation, often, changed the proportion among habitats, with a reduction of wood and an increase of cerealicolous-zootechnical areas. The transformation began during the Greek and Roman period but created some open habitats, as prairie or cerealicolous-zootechnical, very rich in biodiversity. Actually in Sicily, the highest number of threatened species are linked to this habitat and are at high risk, due to process of intensification of agriculture, occurring since the II World War. In many areas of Europe species at risk are also presently tied to agrarian systems. Some species living in woodland became extinct because of wood cutting occurred in the past century. Today, due to the protection of woods, their fauna has stable populations or is increasing, because of the re-naturalization process of allochthonous woods. Species present in wetlands are currently increasing thanks to the protection of such habitats. This paper will allow to establish priorities for protection and action that may contribute to the increase of animal biodiversity in Sicily.


Landscape, Environmental changes, Birds, Mammals, Reptiles, Amphibians, Sicily


The current distribution and density of animal species mainly depends on the changes in climatic conditions and on the effects of human activities on habitats ([80], [71], [78], [70]). Among the latter the most relevant are agriculture, pasture and forestry, whose relationships with the environment have been repeatedly investigated (see [30]). However, we would like to remind and emphasize here that man, once collector and hunter, became, in time, producer. Agriculture, which was a primary productive sector, became the main cause of environmental changes.

Some changes were often drastic and devastating, largely affecting expansion and/or decline processes of animal species. Such process concerned species living in habitats that were constantly reduced, as wetlands, steppic areas and woodlands, never replaced by similar newly established biotopes.

Nevertheless, in the ’800s the influence of agrosilvopastoral activities in Sicily did not cause disastrous events in wildlife, since energy sources and products for agriculture remained natural or eco-compatible. Problems began when farmers, during their legitimate freeing process from agricultural traditional forms of work, massively applied mechanization, aiming at increasing productivity ([24]) and introduced foreign molecules into biogeochemical cycles. Since then it has been necessary to make a great effort, which has also taken quite a long time, to aim at re-establishing agrosilvopastoral forms, more compatible with the environment.

However, as far as fauna’s decline is concerned, there is some uncertainty in assigning great and direct responsibility to agricultural activities; probably a very bad and unadvised territorial management was the real reason of the extinction and the decline of some animal populations. Mediterranean vegetation is considered resilient, maquis very easily reverts to woodland if woodcutting, browsing and burning stop ([20]). Environmental changes affected by agrosylvopastoral activities likely produced population fluctuations of animal species, which, in turn, showed a high resilience and ability to adapt to new habitats; however, specialized species were unable to adapt themselves to newly established habitats (e.g., Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax, Andalusian Hemipode Turnix sylvatica, etc.).

In this paper we are going to describe recent changes in forestry, agriculture and pasture which have involved changes in the Sicilian fauna distribution, causing its decline, as well as its increase.

Materials and Methods 

Study area

The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most important plant biodiversity hot-spots of the world ([60], [22], [59]). Due to its peculiar position, Sicily (about 25000 Km2) played and still plays a major role for plant dispersal, survival, and evolution within this region. 2.793 native vascular plants live on the island ([9]); many are endemic, rare, depleted and/or threatened taxa. The reason of the high biodiversity depends on the biogeographic history, which in turn influenced the high variability of environmental conditions. Plains cover 14.2% of the territory, hills 61.4% and mountains 24.4%. There are high lithological differences present on Sicilian soil associations, showed by 33 different types ([16]). According to Rivas-Martinez classifications, main bioclimatic zones are infra, thermo, meso, supra, oro and crioro Mediterranean ([8]). According to Corine Land Cover level 1, agricultural areas cover 1785583 ha, forest and semi-natural areas 674511 ha, wetlands 2791 and artificial surfaces 112937 ha.

Source of data and methodologies

Changes in the soil use were drawn from La Mantia & Barbera ([24]); data on the application of Rural Development Policy carried out by the Sicilian Region were extracted and processed from rules applied by the Assessorato Regionale Agricoltura e Foreste Regione Siciliana. Old changes of the Sicilian landscape are based on the historical literature, cited along the text.

Data on the presence and possible decline of mammals, reptiles and amphibians were drawn from literature and personal information acquired in Sicily, during the last twenty years. Distribution and population trend of bird species derive from data acquired during the achievement of the Sicilian Atlas Projects (1979-1983: [54]; 1984-1992: [42]; 1993-2006: [1]). Overall population trends of bird species (1984-1992 and 1993-2006 periods) was estimated as follows: 0 = stable; -1 = moderately declining (less than 50%); -2 = largely declining (more than 50%); 1 = moderately increasing (less than 50%); 2 = largely increasing (more than 50%).

According to BirdLife International ([7]), among the 524 European species, 226 are classified as Spec1-3, needing special conservation measures; European Spec1 (n = 40) are species of global conservation concern, Spec2 (n = 45) have unfavourable conservation status and are mainly concentrated in Europe, Spec3 (n = 141) have unfavourable conservation status, but are not mainly concentrated in Europe; furthermore the NonSpecE (n = 94) have favourable conservation status, but are mainly concentrated in Europe. We gave a “weight” to bird species recorded as Spec1-3 and NonSpecE, to those listed in the Italian Red List of breeding birds (RL) by LIPU-WWF ([40]) and to those reported in the Appendix I of the 79/409 Bird Directive; intrinsic value of birds was estimated as follows: Σ (Spec) (RL) (79/409), being Spec1 = 1, Spec2= 0.75, Spec3= 0.50, NonSpecE = 0.25; EX (extinct species) = 1, CR (critically endangered) = 0.80, EN (endangered) = 0.60, VU (vulnerable) = 0.40, LR (at lower risk) = 0.20; 79/409 = 1 (cf. Tab. 1).

Tab. 1 - Terrestrial sicilian breeding birds in selected habitats.

Scientific name Habitat 79/409 Status in Europe Italian Red List Trend in Italy (1970-90) Trend in Italy (1990-2000) Trend in Sicily (1979-1992) Trend in Sicily (1993-2006) Intrinsic value Σ (intrinsic value) per habitat
1. Sturnus vulgaris Arboreous and urban areas - SPEC3 - 0 1 1 0 0.5 1.0
2. Passer hispaniolensis Arboreous and urban areas - - - 0 0 0 0 0
3. Passer montanus Arboreous and urban areas - SPEC3 - 0 -1 1 0 0.5
4. Corvus corone Arboreous and urban areas - - - 0 0 0 0 0
5. Falco eleonorae Cliffs on small islands - SPEC2 VU 0 0 0 0 2.15 2.15
6. Ciconia ciconia Grasslands - SPEC2 LR 2 1 1 2 1.95 24.15
7. Coturnix coturnix Grasslands - SPEC3 LR -1 ? -2 0 0.7
8. Burhinus oedicnemus Grasslands - SPEC3 EN -1 -1 -1 0 2.1
9. Merops apiaster Grasslands - SPEC3 - 0 1 1 2 0.5
10. Coracias garrulus Grasslands - SPEC2 EN -1 0 -2 -2 2.35
11. Melanocorypha calandra Grasslands - SPEC3 LR -1 -1 -2 -2 1.7
12. Calandrella brachydactyla Grasslands - SPEC3 - 0 -1 -1 -1 1.5
13. Galerida cristata Grasslands - SPEC3 - -1 0 0 0 0.5
14. Alauda arvensis Grasslands - SPEC3 - -1 -1 -2 0 0.5
15. Anthus campestris Grasslands - SPEC3 - -1 -1 0 -1 0.5
16. Saxicola torquatus Grasslands - - - 1 0 0 0 0
17. Cisticola juncidis Grasslands - - - 0 0 0 1 0
18. Sylvia conspicillata Grasslands - - - 0 ? 0 0 0.25
19. Miliaria calandra Grasslands - SPEC2 - -1 -1 0 0 0.75
20. Otus scops Grasslands and arboreous areas - SPEC2 LR -1 -1 -1 0 0.95
21. Glareola pratincola Grasslands and humid areas - SPEC3 EN 0 0 -1 0 2.1
22. Motacilla flava Grasslands and humid areas - - - 0 0 1 -1 0
23. Hirundo rustica Grasslands and urban areas - SPEC3 - -1 0 0 1 0.5
24. Delichon urbicum Grasslands and urban areas - SPEC3 - 0 0 1 1 0.5
25. Sturnus unicolor Grasslands and urban areas - NonSPECE - 0 0 1 1 0.25
26. Lullula arborea Grasslands and wood edges - SPEC2 - 0 0 0 0 1.75
27. Streptopelia turtur Grasslands and woods - SPEC3 - 0 0 0 0 0.5
28. Athene noctua Grasslands, with scattered trees - SPEC3 - 0 0 0 0 0.5
29. Lanius senator Grasslands, with scattered trees - SPEC2 LR -1 -1 -1 -1 0.95
30. Lanius collurio Grasslands, with scattered shrubs - SPEC3 - -1 -1 -1 -1 0.5
31. Lanius minor Grasslands, with scattered trees - SPEC2 EN -1 -1 -1 -2 2.35
32. Acrocephalus scirpaceus Humid areas - NonSPECE - -1 0 0 0 0.25 0.25
33. Acrocephalus arundinaceus Humid areas - - - -1 -1 -2 -1 0
34. Sylvia cantillans Maquis - NonSPECE - 0 0 0 0 0.25 4.0
35. Sylvia communis Maquis - NonSPECE - 0 0 0 0 0.25
36. Sylvia undata Maquis - SPEC2 - 0 0 0 0 1.75
37. Sylvia melanocephala Maquis and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 0 0 1 0.25
38. Carduelis carduelis Maquis and Grasslands - - - 0 0 0 1 0
39. Carduelis cannabina Maquis and Grasslands - SPEC2 - 0 0 0 0 0.75
40. Emberiza cirlus Maquis and Grasslands - NonSPECE - 0 0 1 0 0.25
41. Emberiza cia Maquis and rocky areas - SPEC3 - -1 0 0 0 0.5
42. Remiz pendulinus Rivers and humid areas - - - 1 1 1 1 0 0
43. Motacilla cinerea Rivers and urban areas - - - 0 0 0 0 0
44. Motacilla alba Rivers and urban areas - - - -1 0 0 0 0
45. Cettia cetti Rivers, humid areas, maquis - - - 1 0 0 0 0
46. Apus pallidus Rocky and urban areas - - LR 1 0 1 1 0.2 26.15
47. Apus apus Rocky and urban areas - - - 0 0 0 0 0
48. Corvus monedula Rocky and urban areas - NonSPECE - 1 0 1 1 0.25
49. Milvus milvus Rocky areas - SPEC2 EN -1 0 -2 -2 2.35
50. Milvus migrans Rocky areas - SPEC3 VU 0 0 0 -1 1.9
51. Neophron percnopterus Rocky areas - SPEC3 CR -2 -2 -2 -1 2.3
52. Aquila chrysaetos Rocky areas - SPEC3 VU 0 0 1 0 1.9
53. Hieraaetus fasciatus Rocky areas - SPEC3 CR -1 -1 -1 -1 2.3
54. Falco tinnunculus Rocky areas - SPEC3 - -1 1 0 1 0.5
55. Falco biarmicus Rocky areas - SPEC3 EN -1 -1 0 0 2.1
56. Falco peregrinus Rocky areas - - VU -1 4 1 1 1.9
57. Alectoris graeca Rocky areas - SPEC2 VU -1 -1 -1 whitakeri -2 whitakeri 2.15
58. Tyto alba Rocky areas - SPEC3 LR -1 -1 0 1 1.7
59. Apus melba Rocky areas - - LR 0 0 0 0 0.2
60. Ptyonoprogne rupestris Rocky areas - - - 0 0 -1 0 0
61. Oenanthe oenanthe Rocky areas - SPEC3 - 0 -1 0 0 0.5
62. Monticola saxatilis Rocky areas - SPEC3 LR -1 -1 0 0 0.7
63. Monticola solitarius Rocky areas - SPEC3 - -1 0 0 0 0.5
64. Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax Rocky areas - SPEC3 VU -2 0 -2 -1 1.9
65. Corvus corax Rocky areas - - LR 0 0 0 -1 0.2
66. Petronia petronia Rocky areas - - - -1 0 0 0 0
67. Falco naumanni Rocky areas and grasslands - SPEC1 LR -1 2 -1 0 2.20
68. Columba livia Rocky areas and Grasslands - - VU No data 0 0 1 0.4
69. Buteo buteo Rocky areas and woods - - - -1 1 0 0 0
70. Phoenicurus ochruros Rocky areas and woods - - - 0 0 0 0 0
71. Circaetus gallicus Scattered trees on hills - SPEC3 EN -1 0 0* 0 2.1 2.1
72. Streptopelia decaocto Urban and cultivated areas - - - 1 1 1 2 0 0
73. Columba palumbus Woods and urban areas - NonSPECE - 1 1 2 2 0.25 10.45
74. Accipiter nisus Woods - - - 0 1 0 1 1.0
75. Falco subbuteo Woods - - VU -1 1 0 1 0.4
76. Cuculus canorus Woods - - - 0 0 0 0 0
77. Asio otus Woods - - LR 0 0 1 1 0.2
78. Strix aluco Woods - NonSPECE - -1 0 0 0 0.25
79. Caprimulgus europaeus Woods - SPEC2 LR -1 -1 0 0 1.95
80. Jynx torquilla Woods - SPEC3 - -1 -1 1 0 0.5
81. Dendrocopos major Woods - - - -1 0 1 2 0
82. Luscinia megarhynchos Woods - NonSPECE - 1 0 0 0 0.25
83. Turdus viscivorus Woods - NonSPECE - -1 -1 0 0 0.25
84. Aegithalos caudatus Woods - - LR 0 0 0 siculus 0 siculus 0.2
85. Poecile palustris Woods - SPEC3 CR 0 ? 0 siculus 0 siculus 1.3
86. Periparus ater Woods - - - 0 ? 0 1 0
87. Cyanistes caeruleus Woods - NonSPECE - 0 0 0 0 0.25
88. Sitta europaea Woods - - - -1 0 0 0 0
89. Garrulus glandarius Woods - - - 0 1 0 1 0
90. Carduelis spinus Woods - NonSPECE VU 0 0 0 0 0.65
91. Loxia curvirostra Woods - - - No data 0 1 0 0
92. Upupa epops Woods and arboreous areas - SPEC3 - 0 ? 1 1 0.5
93. Oriolus oriolus Woods and arboreous areas - - - 0 0 0 0 0
94. Troglodytes troglodytes Woods and gardens - - - 0 0 1 1 0
95. Erithacus rubecula Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 0 1 1 0.25
96. Turdus merula Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 1 1 2 1 0.25
97. Sylvia atricapilla Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 0 0 1 0.25
98. Phylloscopus collybita Woods and gardens - - - 0 0 0 1 0
99. Regulus ignicapilla Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 0 1 1 0.25
100. Muscicapa striata Woods and gardens - SPEC3 - 0 0 1 1 0.5
101. Parus major Woods and gardens - - - 0 0 0 0 0
102. Certhia brachydactyla Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 0 1 0 0.25
103. Pica pica Woods and gardens - - - 0 1 2 2 0
104. Fringilla coelebs Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 0 0 -1 0.25
105. Serinus serinus Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 1 1 1 1 0.25
106. Carduelis chloris Woods and gardens - NonSPECE - 0 1 0 1 0.25

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Results and Discussion 

Changes in forestry and agriculture

Rural Development Policy (RDP) in Sicily

Agriculture generally declined and is no longer a major part of the economics of south European countries ([20]). Baldock et al. ([4]) pointed out that agriculture has undergone changes of two types: 1) farm practices (growth or decrease of livestock densities, stable raising, changes in the turnover cultivation, tillage dates, harvest and inputs); 2) changes imposed by the land use (conversion towards a radically different kind of agriculture, as the irrigated system, total abandonment of agriculture or passage to forestry). Both cases produce a gradual loss of system’s natural equilibrium. Conversely, agriculture may beneficially affect land use through traditional land management practices, as low density pasture in economically secondary areas, mainly dependent on natural or seminatural pastures, or on not irrigated cereal extensive cultivation (like in wide areas of southern Europe), these last being considered practices of high natural value ([13]). In recent years, the subsidized production of hard wheat (for production of pasta) allowed to cultivate unstable land, which should have been otherwise abandoned with a consequent acceleration towards an erosion process.

The high involvement of farmers to the set-aside measure is strictly linked with the crisis of wheat production. During the application of set-aside measure (1989-94), about 25% of the entire Italian territory destined to this practice was located in Sicily. This measure has been partially replaced by the F2 measure of the EEC Reg. 2078 during 1995-98 period, interested 1344 farms for a surface of 10073 ha ([24]). In 2001 the Sicilian region adopted and applied the Rural Development Policy (RDP) 2000-2006 foreseen by the European Union. It should be pointed out that RDP promotes specific eco-compatible actions: reduction of inputs; sowable ground transformation into grazing; integrated and biological agriculture; twenty year retirement from the production; re-establishment and maintenance of traditional agrarian landscape; increase of natural and seminatural areas; management models potentially favouring animal populations.

Overall percentage of the agrarian surface where RDP was applied (97366.05 ha) on the total amount of Usable Agrarian Surface (UAS - 1281654.84 ha) varied very much in the nine provinces of Sicily, with the lowest values in the Agrigento and Caltanissetta (6-7%) and the highest in the Ragusa and Siracusa provinces (16.3% and 21.2%). Altogether, regional commitment interested 11.47% of the UAS. Agri-environment regulations aimed also at improving marketing conditions and preserving farmer’s health. An important application of this objective, biological agriculture ranged from 1.3% (Agrigento) to 13.0 and 13.1 (Enna and Ragusa respectively). Regional commitment in this case involved 7% of UAS. 15341.39 ha (15.8% of RDPs) was applied within protected areas (Natural Parks, Nature Reserves, etc.); the most important areas in this case lie within Parks, which show different agriculture traditions. Nebrodi Park has developed pastures and sowable grounds in order to feed livestock and extensive cattle breeding activities, agriculture in the Madonie Park is more characterized by sowable grounds, while Etna Park holds many hazel groves, pistachio groves and vineyards.

We also highlight that some traditional forms of agriculture maintain a rich habitat mosaic, which allows the growth of arthropod diversity in the agroecosystems ([72]). Mediterranean grasslands usually hold annual plant species, which arise after autumn rains and produce seeds in spring, then die, at the beginning of the summer, remaining as seeds on the ground. Overgrazing encourages a limited number of herbaceous resistant species (like some thistles), reducing floristic quality and diversity ([6]); conversely, a moderate livestock pressure promotes nutritional diversity and quality of grazing, favouring the presence of legume species, which enrich the soil with nitrogen.

Changes in the forestry

In 1847, for over thirty years, half of the Sicilian wood surface was cut, especially to provide fuel for sulphur mines (Mack [77]). According to a survey of 1911, 98.000 ha of wood still covered the island, but, after the II World War, only 85643 ha remained, therefore counting for 3.3% of Sicily’s surface. Deforestation and land reclamation produced an important hydrogeological and environmental instability. Water sources and river flows were drastically reduced; erosion interested at least 40% of land. After half of the past century the wood surface increased from 86000 (1947) to 159000 ha (1966 - [24]). From half of the 70s’ to 2003, wood surface increased only from 200000 to 222000 ha, due to wildfires, which burned 6000 ha/year in twenty years, with peaks of 16000 in 1988. Fires concerned mainly maquis and conifer wood, much less natural forests. Generally, afforestations were carried out using exotic species; indeed, 130000 ha are “artificial woods”, as Eucalyptus (35000) and Pinus sp. (92.000: 43% P. halepensis, 39% P. pinea, 17% P. nigra). From an environmental point of view, afforestations did not increase biodiversity for two reasons: 1) effects of afforestation techniques reduced pre-existing biodiversity ([65], [26]); 2) current wooded areas consist of many exotic species, as Eucalyptus, or conifers (Pinus, Cedrus, Cupressus), often subjected to fires, almost completely lacking of naturalistic interest ([31]) in particular for flora biodiversity ([65], [26], unpublished data) and fauna ([55]).

As far as point 1) is concerned, it must be considered that until the 60s’ implanting work was done manually. Due to the fact that mostly steep grounds had to be forested, the solution was terracing, which would have permitted to safeguard the existing shrub vegetation. Instead, the adoption of mechanization caused serious land losses and a significantly reduced diversity ([65], [26]).

The main problem of wood management is fire prevention; in most cases in fact, the slow and gradual re-naturalization process, occurring in conifer afforestations is interrupted by fire. During the last century, the silviculture has also undergone some changes, and even if there were some rare cases of forest management, these changes were mainly limited to wood cleaning, fire prevention and unavoidable progressive anthropization. In many cases management of protected areas proceeded to a dogmatic conversion from coppices to high forest, without any planning. Public and private bodies managing woods in Sicily addressed forest management mainly to hydrogeological and/or naturalistic functions, and rarely to their silvicultural utilization.

Furthemore wood plantations, between forest activity and agriculture (about 35000 ha), took place in Sicily under the EEC regulation 2080/1992, but a greater part of those surfaces has been wrongly misused due to incorrect technical choices ([34]) with serious repercussions on the landscape and the biodiversity ([31], [27]).

Changes in agriculture and cattle breeding

While it is difficult to provide quantitative data on the evolution of Sicilian agriculture landscape, it is possible to highlight the qualitative process causing this change. Likely, a first heavily modifying phase took place during Greek and Roman dominations. During that period in fact, the first important habitat changes, mainly characterized by massive deforestation, occurred. From the V to the VII century, due to a long period of population decrease and of agricultural decline, fertile land and cultivated fields were abandoned, while sheep-rearing prevailed. After the fall of the Roman Empire and the barbarian invasions, the Arabs settled in, dominating, and agriculture increased. Deserted latifundia were cultivated and new plantations (the so-called mediterranean garden) gave Sicily a new landscape shape. Consequently, forests, marshes and uncultivated land increased. Between the XI and the XIII century further changes, land reclamations and tillages occurred and above all, forests suffered from man’s interference. In the following centuries, anthropic pressure in the country diminished, mainly far from the coasts, and in the XV century, thanks to the sugar cane diffusion, coastal woods of a great part of western and eastern Sicily were definitely destroyed. Overall, the last serious period of destruction and environmental changes occurred when Italy became a unified country. Splitting of the estates, poverty and the need of land to cultivate produced a further wide deforestation; the maximum cutting of woods took place during the second half of the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, when sulphur mines exploitation and agricultural contingencies produced a further important wood cutting with a contemporary tillage and ploughing of wide inland areas carried out by a rural population still living in a semi-feudal condition. Since then, vineyards, citrus and olive plantations were spreading along coastal plains, rivers and hills, maintaining the same characteristics that are still found nowadays. Nevertheless, during the last fifty years, a more modern agriculture replaced the traditional one, and the use of mechanization and pesticides allowed to increase farm crop productivity. Finally, the unadvised development of industry, tourism, and population caused a degradation previously not recorded.

As far as climate in the Mediterranean area is concerned, there is no evidence, since 1850, of a general wet or dry trend. Grove & Rackham ([20]) report that the 1850s tended to be wet and the late 1860s dry, then a generally wet period from 1880 to 1900 followed, from then until 1925 no clear pattern emerged, the late 1920s and early 1930s were dry, the late 1930s wet, the mid 1940s dry, the 1960s were generally wet, the early 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s dry, the late 1990s wet. Rainfall data show a decline from 1950 to 1990.

Extensive agriculture, still widespread in south-European countries and generally along countries bordering the Mediterranean, is characterized by low inputs, low productivity, absence of irrigation systems, low numbers of livestock, regular fallow practice and high vegetation heterogeneity. The introduction of innovative agriculture techniques after 1960 (Tab. 2, Tab. 3) disfigured deeply the agrarian landscape, mainly the cerealicolous-zootechnical one, producing a great decline of animal populations, in particular of some bird species linked to traditional agroecosystems.

Tab. 2 - Changes occurred in the sicilian agroecosystems before and after 1960 (greenhouses, horticulture and industrial culture are excluded).

Agroecosystems Traditional systems before 1950-1960 Modern systems after 1960
Cerealicolous Crop rotation with legumes Monoculture
Manuring and scarce supplement with chemical fertilizer Chemical fertilization
Manual tillage or assisted by farm animals Mechanical tillage, chemical weedkiller
Old varieties New varieties
Traditional system of seeding Seed tanning
Citrus, Olive plantations, Vineyards, etc. Manuring Chemical fertilization
Manual tillage or assisted by farm animals Mechanical tillage, chemical weedkiller
Pruning Changes of tree growing shape and new pruning techniques
Low control of disease with pesticides Control of adversities with pesticides
Old and authochtonous cultivars New varieties and species
Traditional system of irrigation Introduction of new irrigation systems
Almond, Hazel, Carob groves (orchard to be neglected) Manuring, green manure Scarce use of chemical fertilizers
Manual tillage or assisted by farm animals Mechanical tillage
Pruning Pruning
Table wine - Chemical fertilizers
Mechanical tillage
Massive control of adversities with pesticides and weed killers
New varieties
Pastoral Transumance Food integration
Old races New races

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Tab. 3 - Large mammals become extinct in Sicily. Some Mammals (Capreolus capreolus for example) are considered allochthonous species in Sicily, introduced by man.

Species Extinction year Causes References
Monachus monachus after 1975 Human persecution; genetic drift? La Mantia & Massa (in press)
Canis lupus about 1935 Hunting, human persecution [25]
Lutra lutra before 1850? Habitat loss, human interference, genetic drift? [25]
Capreolus capreolus about 1870 Hunting, human interference, habitat loss [25]
Cervus elaphus before 1800 Hunting, human interference, habitat loss [25]
Dama dama 1845 Hunting, human interference, habitat loss [25]
Sus scrofa about 1870 Hunting, human interference [25]

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Beyond the agronomic techniques, after the post-war period spreading of cultivations changed ([24]). Tree plantations are characterized by the disappearance of traditional orchards; they involve, particularly, almond trees (from 266800 ha - pure and mixed orchards - on 1961 to 75940 ha - pure orchards - on 1991 to 65235 ha - pure orchards - on 2000) characterizing inland and coastal hill landscapes. This species is traditionally cultivated on hilly land and contributes to the reduction of soil erosion, which becomes more and more widespread on the entire Sicilian territory. Carob tree, a typical element of the Iblean landscape, is also largely decreasing (from 70800 ha - pure and mixed orchards - on 1961 to 27720 - pure orchards - on 1991 to 26545 - pure orchard - on 2000). Other tree cultivations, such as chestnut (characterizing mountain landscape) have almost nearly disappeared because of disease problems, as well as economical reasons ([33]).

In other cases, as that of the citrus groves, the stability of the cultivated area is evidenced, while other cultivations, as grapevines, are undergoing towards an extensive decline. The decrease of grapevine areas (from 221750 ha - pure and mixed orchards - on 1961 to 159800 ha - pure orchards - on 1991 to 143800 ha - pure orchards - on 2000) is caused by a more generalized problem at EU level. Traditional “small trees” system of cultivation has a low impact but is also unproductive; intensification (modern cultivation shape) on the other hand, leads to the loss of the typical traditional landscape of the coastal hills. As far as grape are concerned, the increase of cultivated areas (from 16600 ha - pure and mixed orchards - on 1961 to 26610 ha - pure orchards - on 1991, but decreasing to 17996 ha - pure orchards - on 2000) expanded mainly due to intensive cultivation of the “Italia“ variety. Cultivation techniques of ”Italia” grapes, using plastic coverings, determines a worsening of the microclimatic conditions and forces farmers to a frequent use of pesticides, therefore causing serious problems of residual toxic contents, especially in the late production. Moreover, increased irrigation needs give birth to strong impoverishment and salinisation of the water stratum.

More radical changes concern open field cultivations. In the Sicilian inland areas, characterized by a good integration between agriculture and cattle breeding, traditional cultivations, like cereals and legumes, have been strongly changed. In the first decades of the last century, some cultivated species and varieties which characterized these agricultural systems disappeared. Wheat old varieties were able to produce high amounts of straw for animals as food or bedstraw, as well as to fight against weeds; even if their productivity was stable, they were poorly productive. New varieties are more productive, shorter, and especially require high inputs of fertilizers ([24], [66]). The general decrease of the surfaces used for dry cultivations (wheat from 649900 ha on 1961 to 381700 ha on 1991 to 334100 ha on 2000) overlaps with the legume decline and mainly with the reduction of Italian Sainfoin (Hedysarum coronarium - from 188400 ha on 1961 to 125600 on 1991 to 90940 ha on 2000).

Areas cultivated with legumes (Vicia faba, Lens esculenta and Cicer sativum) decreased from 249470 ha in 1961 to 62170 ha on 1991, and to 28795 ha in 2000. Today, an increasing interest for balanced diets, with a progressive reduction of animal proteins and an increase of vegetable in human feeding, renewed interest towards these cultivations. Because of land abandonment, a recent increase of pasture areas produced an increase of sheep, and not of cattle. The latter indeed are preferably reared in modern structures; therefore bovines increased from 330000 in 1961 to 528000 in 2000, ovines from 591000 to 1291000, caprines decreased from 218000 to 205000, pigs from 103000 to 98000 and equines from 266000 to 99000 ([24]). Furthermore, during the last century, ovines strongly declined and this was possibly the main reason why vultures decreased and disappeared. At the beginning of the last century Coppola ([10]) already reported that “of the magnificent herds of thousands of cattles that used to be the honour and pride of the Sicilian manor farms, it does not remain more than a few rare examples”. Just before the II World War ovines were around a million, equines and caprines about 400000, bovines and pigs 200000 ([58]).

Large herds were closely linked to turnover systems and their changes caused the disappearance or decline of some bird species of cerealicolous areas. Formerly, different turnover systems were applied, namely three years with wheat-pasture-fallow fields or five years with fallow-wheat-pasture-pasture, thus providing to birds large possibilities to find undisturbed nesting sites and adjacent feeding areas too ([10]). Other turnovers, like the pasture-pasture-wheat or the fallow field (or broad bean)-wheat-pasture, allowed the presence of large herds.

The areas of industrial cultivations (tobacco, fiber and seeds species) decreased from 21300 ha in 1961 to 300 in 2000, but floriculture and greenhouse products increased, reaching in the last years international markets (from 300 ha in 1961 to 10400 in 2000). Concerning the last ones, from 1981 onwards they have remarkably influenced the economical development of the entire territory of Ragusa. In this case, like for “Italia” grapes, spreading of greenhouse systems had a remarkable socio-economic influence on the territory, but in the last years it has undergone a deep economic crisis. Greenhouses also produced highly negative effects on the environment and on the health of people working there.

Finally, cereal-zootechnical landscape and that of coastal plains were subjected to the highest transformations as a result of the introduction of irrigation methods and afforestation actions. These conversions produced an intensification of agriculture; from the 1940s to the 1980s, farmers were economically encouraged towards this intensification, thus producing soil erosion. Additionally, mechanization increased remarkably, the horse-power (in thousands) increased from 223 in 1961 to 6183 in 1991 and the mechanical power hectares-1 also increased from 0.88 in 1971 to 4.3 in 1999. Among all pesticides the use of herbicides increased from 9100 kg in 1961 to 1613700 in 1999 while the use of fumigants increased from 165300 to 3875600 kg.

Faunal change

Large Mammals and Birds become extinct

Due to scarce references, we are not able to understand exactly how the changes above described affected the distribution, increase or decline of small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Conversely, references and precise information on large mammals and birds decline give us the possibility to show their trend between the half of the 1800s and that one of the 1900s ([25]).

Tab. 2 lists seven large mammals which have become extinct in Sicily, also recording some possible causes of their decreasing and extinction. Most of them were seriously affected by habitat loss and hunting between 1800 and 1850. For what concerns the Otter (Lutra lutra), it seems possible that the species had already become extinct in the first half of 1800s, and not in 1954 (when drainage of the Lentini lake was completed), as supposed by Sarà ([74]). Only two of these seven species still lived in the 1900s, the Monkseal (Monachus monachus) and the Wolf (Canis lupus), whose extinction was mainly due to human persecution, respectively by fishermen and shepherds.

Changes and reconversions that have taken place over hundreds of years, producing a complex agrosilvopastoral landscape, characterized by seral stages, ecotones and secondary successions, favoured many species of birds of shrubby, steppic and open habitats. In the last century, further changes, mainly due to land exploitation, caused the extinction of some of them. Tab. 4 lists 14 bird species extinct in Sicily before and after 1960. We assume that only four of them were actually effected by agriculture and cattle breeding changes, namely Francolin (Francolinus francolinus), Andalusian Hemipode (Turnix sylvatica), Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) and Little Bustard (Tetrax tetrax). Drainage of wetlands caused the decline of another four species, while supposedly the Lammergeier (Gypaetus barbatus), the Osprey (Pandion haliaetus), three species of woodpeckers (Dryocopus martius, Picus viridis and Dendrocopus minor) and the Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) were decreasing for a genetic bottleneck phenomenon, being at the southern edge of their distribution. Nevertheless, woodland was reduced to 10% at the beginning of the I World War and to 3.3% after the II World War, and eventually produced the decline (or extinction) of some stenoecious forest species (e.g., woodpeckers).

Tab. 4 - Bird species become extinct in Sicily.

Species Extinction year Causes References
before 1960
Netta rufina after 1943 Drainage of wetlands [79]
Oxyura leucocephala before 1869 Drainage of wetlands Zuccarello [67]
Gypaetus barbatus after 1916 Very small population, genetic drift [57]
Francolinus francolinus about 1840 Hunting, habitat transformation, etc. [39], [14]
Porphyrio porphyrio after 1950 Drainage of wetlands, hunting [23]
Turnix sylvatica about 1920 Hunting, habitat transformation, land reclamation [62], [85]
Dryocopus martius before 1900; probably wandering from Italy, not breeding in Sicily Genetic drift? Wood cutting? [14], [81], [61]
Picus viridis about 1930 Genetic drift? Wood cutting? [61], [23]
Dendrocopus minor about 1930 Genetic drift? Wood cutting? [61]
Panurus biarmicus between 1930 and 1950 Drainage of wetlands [63], [68]
after 1960
Pandion haliaetus about 1968 Human interference to breeding sites. Genetic drift? [52]
Gyps fulvus 1965 Hunting, habitat transformation, changes of pastoral and agriculture activities [69]
Tetrax tetrax about 1970 Hunting, agriculture changes [23]
Bubo bubo last confirmed breeding: 1935; last observation: 1978 Genetic drift? Hunting? Wood cutting? [75]

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Current status of terrestrial Reptiles, Amphibians and Mammals in Sicily

Only five species of Amphibians live in Sicily (Tab. 5); another two (Salamandra salamandra and Triturus carnifex) have been repeatedly recorded (e.g., [41], [84]), but their past and current presence should be confirmed ([1]). Two species (Discoglossus pictus and Hyla intermedia) declined in the last years, because of pollution, habitat loss and alteration and conversion from old irrigation systems to modern ones ([32]). Some 21 species of Reptiles are currently present in Sicily, six of which live only on surrounding islands; only one (Testudo hermanni) has to be considered critically endangered, others are only slightly affected by negative factors.

Tab. 5 - Reptiles and Amphibians living in Sicily and their status (sources: [30], [41], [84], [11], pers. observ.). * = endemic taxa.

Species Status Habitat Factors affecting eventual decline
Discoglossus pictus Uncommon and decreasing in the orchards Small rivers, ponds and water basins, often in agroecosystems Removal and conversion from old irrigation systems to modern ones
Bufo bufo Common and widespread, decreasing in the orchards Ponds, reservoirs, rivers Herbicides
Bufo viridis Very common and widespread Ponds, reservoirs, water basins -
Hyla intermedia Scarce and decreasing, up to 1700 m Rivers with reeds, citrus groves and gardens next to the water Pollution, habitat loss and alteration, conversion from old irrigation systems to modern ones
Rana bergeri x hispanica Common and widespread, up to 1700 m, decreasing in the orchards Rivers, ponds, reservoirs, water basins, etc. Pollution, conversion from old irrigation systems to modern ones
Emys trinacris* Common, locally decreasing, up to 1500 m Rivers, ponds, reservoirs, water basins, etc. Pollution, habitat loss and alteration, introduction of competitive exotic species
Testudo hermanni Rare and local, decreasing Wood clearings and edges, maquis Collecting, fires, habitat loss
Hemidactylus turcicus Common and widespread, up to 600 m Rocky habitats, woods, rural andurban areas -
Tarentola mauritanica Common and widespread, up to 1250 m Rocky habitats, woods, rural and urban areas -
Lacerta bilineata Common, but moderately decreasing, up to 1850 m Maquis, wood edges, areas close to water, hedgerows Habitat alteration
Podarcis filfolensis* Very common In Italy only on Pelagian Is. -
Podarcis raffonei* Uncommon, some populations are endangered Only Aeolian Is. Habitat alteration
Podarcis sicula Common and widespread, up to 2150 m Garrigues, pastures, urban and cultivated areas, gardens, wood edges -
Podarcis wagleriana* Locally common, lacking in NE Sicily, slightly decreasing, up to 1600 m Garrigues, pastures, cultivated areas, gardens, wood edges Possible local competition with P. sicula
Psammodromus algirus Scarce Only on Scoglio dei Conigli (Lampedusa Is.) -
Chalcides chalcides Common, up to 1840 m Rural habitats, grassy and sunny slopes, often next to the water -
Chalcides ocellatus Common, slightly decreasing, up to 1500 m Xeric, stony and rural habitats, pastures Agriculture mechanization
Haemorrhois hippocrepis Uncommon Only on Pantelleria Is. -
Hierophis viridiflavus Common and widespread, up to 1840 m Garrigues, pastures, urban and cultivated areas, gardens, wood edges -
Coronella austriaca Uncommon and local between 800 and 1700 m Wood edges, stony habitats -
Elaphe lineata Uncommon and local, up to 1450 m Garrigues, pastures, cultivated areas, wood edges -
Elaphe situla Scarce and local, up to c. 800 m Xeric and sandy habitats, pastures Habitat loss
Macroprotodon cucullatus Uncommon Only on Lampedusa Is. -
Malpolon monspessulanus Uncommon Only on Lampedusa Is. -
Natrix natrix Common and widespread, up to 1770 m Rivers, reservoirs, ponds, rocky habitats -
Vipera aspis hugyi* Uncommon, up to 1850 m Stony and rocky habitats, clearings and wood edges -

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

On the whole, 23 terrestrial Mammals currently live in Sicily, four of which have been recently introduced (Tab. 6); in 1980 the Azienda Foreste Demaniali of Sicilian Region carried out the re-introduction of the Fallow Deer (Dama dama) and the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa), regrettably without preceding it by a feasibility project, and presently the Wild Boar produces some damages to horticulture and possibly to wood clearings ([36]). Due to rare datasets available, we did not list Chiroptera species; most of them are considered as critically endangered by pesticide use and direct man persecution ([17]). Among autochthonous species today, the most endangered in Sicily is probably Felis silvestris, because of its habitat loss and eventual crossbreeding with feral cats ([73]). Wood management, particularly the cutting of chestnut woods, the conversion from high forest to coppices ([33]), abandonment of hazel groves may seriously affect populations of Glis glis and mainly Muscardinus avellanarius, due to bushes removal and undergrowth clearing, vegetal layers consenting them to move among trees, without going down to the ground ([73]). Furthermore, the expansion of Rattus species may affect competitively other small mammals, like Gliridae. The hare (Lepus corsicanus), living other than in Sicily in the central and southern Apennines and Corsica, have undergone a drastic decline in the ’80s, likely to be due to pesticides and fertilizers use in agriculture, but since the ’90s it has locally shown an increase, possibly due to the application of agri-environmental regulations and the consequent reduction of pesticides spreading. The introduction of allochthonous species (Lepus europaeus) seems unsuccessful so far ([43]). Forestation is considered a danger for the species, especially if carried out with allochthonous species ([82]).

Tab. 6 - Sicilian terrestrial Mammals and their status in Sicily (excluded Chiroptera and introduced or reintroduced species: Myocastor coypus - only on the mouth of Irminio river -, Ovis aries - only on Marettimo Is. -, Dama dama and Sus scrofa). * = endemic taxa.

Species Status Habitat Factors affecting eventual decline
Erinaceus europaeus consolei* Common and widespread Agroecosystems, hedgerows, woods, etc. Locally high mortality along busy roads
Suncus etruscus Common below 1000 m Cerealicolous areas, agroecosystems, garrigues, etc. -
Crocidura sicula* Common and widespreadup to 1600 m Agroecosystems, hedgerows, woods, etc. Tillage and pesticides in agroecosystems
Crocidura pachyura Common Only on Pantelleria Is. -
Oryctolagus cuniculus Common and widespread up to 1800 m Agroecosystems, hedgerows, woods, etc. Hunting, virus spread, due also to introduction of domestic individuals
Lepus corsicanus Uncommon, locally scarce and generally declining, up to 1800 m; set-aside has favoured local increasing Agroecosystems, hedgerows, woods, etc. Hunting, tillage, passage from extensive to intensive agriculture
Eliomys quercinus Scarce, up to 1600 m Agroecosystems, olive groves, hedgerows, woods, etc. Cutting of old olives, fires, competition with rats in rural areas
Glis glis Scarce and local, up to 1500 m Woods Fires, cutting of chestnut woods and abandonment of hazel groves, poaching
Muscardinus avellanarius Scarce and local between 800 and 1600 m Woods Fires, cutting of chestnut woods and abandonment of hazel groves, poaching in particular of undergrowth
Microtus savii Very common and widespread, up to 1800 m Agroecosystems, wood clearings and edges -
Rattus rattus Very common and widespread, up to 1600 m Rural areas, villages, towns, woods -
Rattus norvegicus Very common and widespread, up to 1200 m Houses sewage systems, rivers next to towns and villages, etc. -
Mus domesticus Very common and widespread, up to 1000 m Rural areas, houses, villages, towns, etc. -
Apodemus sylvaticus Common and widespread, up to 1800 m Agroecosystems, groves, woods, etc. -
Hystrix cristata Local and uncommon up to 1600 m Maquis, garrigues, rocky areas, woods Poaching, habitat loss
Vulpes vulpes Common and widespread, up to 2000 m Agroecosystems, woods, urban edges and gardens -
Martes martes Uncommon, locally increasing, up to 1800 m Woods and cultivated areas Poaching, dead individuals frequently found along busy roads
Mustela nivalis Common and widespread, up to 2000 m but in orchard declining probably caused by directly or indirectly pollution Agroecosystems, hedgerows, woods, urban gardens, etc. High mortality observed along busy roads
Felis silvestris Local, up to 1800 m Woods and rocky areas Poaching, habitat loss

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Hunting and poaching are local causes of species decline, and a better hunting management is warmly required. Finally, only some Rodents are noxious to agriculture; among them Microtus savii is considered a local pest to horticulture and in some cases to orchards ([49]).

Current status of terrestrial birds in Sicily

Overall, 106 terrestrial birds breed regularly in Sicily, most of which are linked to grasslands (24.5%), rocky habitats (23.5%), and woodlands (32.1% - Tab. 1). Most birds live in grasslands or use this habitat secondarily. Out of 26 species associated with it, 11 have stable populations, four are in small decline, four in large decline, five in small increase and two in large increase. Total intrinsic value of birds living in grasslands is 24.15. Seven species lie in the Spec2 category, 14 in Spec3, and one in NonSpecE, four species are endangered and five are at lower risk as breeders in Italy.

The most important habitats for birds, together with grasslands, are rocky areas. Often birds living in this habitat also exploit grassland resources, occurring both in rocky and in grassland habitats. 25 species live in rocky areas or secondarily use this habitat; 12 have stable populations, seven are in small increase, four in small decline, two in large decline. One species is listed as Spec1, two as Spec2 and NonSpecE categories, 10 as Spec3, two species are critically endangered, two endangered, six vulnerable and six at lower risk in Italy. Total intrinsic value of birds living in rocky habitats is 26.15. Altogether, birds living in the previous two habitats represent the most important component of the Sicilian avifauna, amounting to the total intrinsic value of 50.30 (total value for all Sicilian terrestrial breeding birds is 70.25).

Few bird species (eight on the total) are more or less strictly associated with the maquis; they have stable populations, two species lie in Spec2, one in Spec3 categories and four in NonSpecE, no species are listed as threatened in Italy.

Finally, 34 species are linked to woodlands, 16 of which are stable, 16 in small increase and two in large increase; no species living in this kind of habitat has shown some decline in the last decades. Only one species is found in the Spec2, four in Spec3, 14 in NonSpecE, one species is critically endangered, two are vulnerable and three are at lower risk; the total intrinsic value of birds living in this habitat is 10.45, showing the modest presence of conservation concern species.

Declining selected species of agroecosystems

Milvus milvus. Greatly declining for at least 15 years, its population has decreased of 80%, from 90 to less than 15 pairs. It occurs in extensive agroecosystems, pastures and sowable grounds, mainly within an area where the percentage application of RDP on UAS is remarkable (range: 4.08-14.71%).

Milvus migrans. Migrant breeder and wintering, it colonized Sicily at the end of the ’70s ([53]), occurring mainly on rocky habitats, pastures and sowable grounds. Its sedentarization in Sicily could depend on the application of agri-environment regulations, but recently has declined.

Neophron percnopterus. Fluctuating, it decreased quickly in the ’90s from 20 to 3-4 pairs, but in the last years it increased again to 7-8 pairs, due to its breeding success (most pairs fledged two chicks); being a migratory bird, abiotic factors bringing about its fluctuation and decrease could take place outside Sicily. Massi et al. ([56]), in the case of two dead vultures found in the Calabria region, report that large amounts of DDT and its metabolites were found in their tissues. Marsili & Massi ([46]) recorded two individuals dead on a sicilian nest in 1990, possibly for the ingestion of poisoned baits. Recent small positive fluctuation may be due to effects of agri-environment policy; good overlapping of sicilian populations of this species and those of Milvus milvus should corroborate this hypothesis.

Alectoris graeca whitakeri. The only thriving populations of this endemic taxon live in the Natural Parks and some Nature Reserves. It feeds on erbaceous plants, leaves, flowers, inflorescences, fruits, bulbs, seeds, in summer preferring insects, as ants, beetles, grasshoppers, etc. ([42]). Set aside of sowable grounds had certainly positive effects on its populations, partially frustrated by hunting activity and poaching, main reasons of its decline.

Burhinus oedicnemus. Declining since many decades in some Italian regions, populations breeding in Sicily are strictly linked to grasslands characterized by stony pastures, often far from rivers; even if locally increasing (e.g., in the Gela plain and along the Salso river), the conservation of the whole Sicilian populations may dependent on the application of agri-environment regulations.

Glareola pratincola. Although this migrant breeder is generally linked to salty habitats, it has a rich population in the sowable grounds of Gela plain (Caltanissetta - [47]), and may be considered a local indicator of eco-compatible management of agroecosystems.

Coracias garrulus. Very threatened species ([47]), it decreased in Italy since 30 years; no persuading reasons of its decline are currently known. We may hypothesize that it is mainly due to the disappearance of dry almonds, often selected as breeding habitat.

Melanocorypha calandra. It is one of the most threatened species, probably on verge of extinction, breeding in the Sicilian grassland, often occurring on pastures and ploughed land; formerly it was also recorded as winter visitor ([23]). Its decline is probably related to cerealiculture changes, selection of new wheat types, of shorter height and early ripening, and, thanks to more advanced threshing machines, to a greater exploitation of straw, cutting it early and close to the ground. Because the breeding cycle of this species actually lies within the season of wheat threshing and straw cutting, its future is very precarious outside areas subjected to set-aside rules.

Calandrella brachydactyla. Less threatened than the previous species, in the last decades it was quickly declining in wide cereal cultivations, possibly as effect of mechanization changes, as above quoted. This hypothesis seems supported by the presence of consistent nuclei in areas where the agricultural activity is absent, like Pantelleria airport.

Lanius spp. Three species of shrikes breed in Sicily, of which only one (Lanius senator) today is still more or less scattered on grasslands characterized by the presence of trees, as almonds, carobs, olives, etc. However, it has declined a lot, for rather unknown reasons, as in other European countries ([38]). The decrease of L. senator and mainly of L. minor (now on verge of extinction in Sicily) could be attributed to the disappearance of dried almonds that made part of their breeding habitat.

The disappearance of L. senator on citrus orchards in Palermo, where it was a very common species, is possibly due to the introduction of pesticides and to a general decline of the species itself ([29]).

Increasing selected species of agroecosystems

Ciconia ciconia. Even if this species is more or less linked to resources living in water, often it preys on insects, lizards and small mammals living in dry grasslands, sometimes many kilometres far from water bodies. Sicilian population has increased very much in the last decade, from 2-4 to over 30 breeding pairs, which are becoming more and more sedentary. Giglioli ([18]) recorded the possibility of their wintering in Sicily. Its increasing is in accordance with the growth of central and south-eastern Europe ([2]) and Tunisia populations ([3]).

Falco naumanni. Even if considered decreasing in the 1970-1990 period (Tab. 1), according to Palumbo ([64]) Italian populations are still very large. In the past, Sicilian most declining colonies were located in cerealicolous areas, where placed their nests on rural buildings, while more stable populations lived on rocky habitats ([42]); in the last decade its decline stopped and it recovered, both in rocky and rural habitats, where colonies of 5-20 pairs breed on roofs of abandoned buildings, particularly in the Gela plain, next to sowable grounds, extensive agroecosystems and grazing, where Mascara & Sarà ([47]) estimate about 300 pairs. In another area in the provinces of Trapani and Palermo, where on late summer huge numbers of this small falcon have been detected, the percentage application of RDP on AUS ranged between 6.22% and 14.21%.

Coturnix coturnix. It was very fluctuating in ’70-’90s, both in Italy and in Sicily and it seems impossible to define a precise trend, but in the last ten years its breeding populations seem stable or increasing, probably thank to agri-environment regulations. During the breeding season, it occurs on areas sown with wheat, secondarily on areas with wheat mixed with forage and on uncultivated land mixed with maquis ([42]). This makes the species particularly vulnerable for the impact of modern cultivation techniques (use of pesticides and mechanisation growth). Set-aside may have good effects on it. Hunting and poaching have surely negative effects on migrant populations in autumn and spring.

Columba palumbus. It is one of the most increasing species in the last 15 years all over Italy and Sicily (including some small islands), where it colonised afforestations and many villages and towns.

Merops apiaster. Probably due to the increasing of part-time apiculture, sicilian populations of this species has grown very much, passing from some pairs in the first years of ’90s to current hundreds or thousands ([19], [50]). Indeed, it occurs on open places, rich in spontaneous plants, where pollinators, particularly bees concentrate. It has been observed that between 1960 and 1996 apiculture increased very much; in the 1968-71 period, in Europe 5841000 beehives were estimated, increasing in 1992 to 7550000, mainly since ’80s, in France, Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal ([50]). In this context, certainly agri-environment regulations favoured this beautiful species.

Hirundo rustica. Sicilian populations of this species has recently increased, colonizing new, both rural and urban sites.

Emberiza calandra. Sedentary, its status is stable, differently from North European populations ([15]); additionally, migrant populations visit Sicily in winter. During the breeding season it occurs on open areas, grazing, cerealicolous areas and garrigues, while in winter it prefers ploughed lands and sowable grounds. We assume that agri-environment regulations very probably favoured this species.

Increasing and declining selected species of woodlands

Dendrocopos major. In the last years, thanks to wide afforestations, some euriecious forest birds have extended their range. According to La Mantia et al. ([35]), this woodpecker recently colonized artificial woods, including Eucalyptus woods, poplar afforestations and riparian woods, with an amount of variation of 6.4%, covering 26.3% of 10x10 km UTM sicilian squares. Its spreading is still continuing today and covers another 25% of 10x10 UTM squares ([1]).

Fringilla coelebs. Sedentary, but also migrant and wintering, in decline as breeder. It occurs on woodlands and arboreal cultivations, feeding in winter on seeds that collects on ploughed land and pastures; before the sunset, small flocks (5-30 individuals) of this species fly from open places to woods, where they shelter during the night. It has been estimated that many thousands of individuals use dormitories in the main sicilian woods and hundreds of thousands of individuals winter in Sicily ([42]). Consequently, Sicilian woodlands raise to international importance for the conservation of this species.

Periparus ater. Among tit species, it is the only recently increasing; it has colonized some artificial pinewoods, whose implantation dates back to at least 40 years. Other two passerines species were increasing colonizing the same wood habitat, that is Regulus ignicapilla and Phylloscopus collybita. Other species (Cyanistes caeruleus and Parus major) increased their population in function of silvicoltural treatment ([55]).

Conclusions and perspectives 

The Sicilian region is, amongst other Mediterranean regions, certainly one of those with the highest drought risk in the next future. The precipitations have certainly decreased, especially during the autumn and winter periods, changing from an average of 750 mm (1921-60) to 650 mm (1961-90, [76]). This has possibly affected the fauna, as some of the data related to birds could demonstrate, but it also mainly confirms the necessity of implementing the woodland surfaces, the expansion of the protected areas and mainly a bigger connection between them.

Protected areas and pCIS/SCZ (respectively 69520.98 and 370342.73 ha) are about 18% of total surface in Sicily (2582588.48 ha) but Regional Parks and most of the Nature Reserves are concentrated in northern parts of the region, pCIS/SCZ are scattered in the rest of the territory. Moreover, many pCIS/SCZ lie within protected areas, so the total surface of these sites actually valuable for the ecological network is much lower (194313.21 ha - [12]).

Recently, Grove & Rackham ([20]) listed eight factors responsible of erosion; among them, at least the following six are frequently occurring in Sicily: 1) bulldozer use; 2) vine implantation on steep and well ploughed land; 3) removal of stone walls in terraced land; 4) picking stones off lands; 5) burning stubble; 6) overgrazing. When tectonics and lithology are favourable, erosion depends mainly on rainfall, particularly on deluges, which are not rare in south Mediterranean areas. Also, the abandonment of agriculture seems to have produced degradation more than a re-naturalization process. Only where wildfire and pasture are absent, the renaturation stopped the degradation ([37]). Human activities, indeed, induced changes as the loss of soil, exposing subsoil or bare rock, and consequent changes in environment or vegetation (Tab. 7, Tab. 8).

Tab. 7 - Some suggested changes for Sicilian afforestation and wood managing in order to reduce the impact to fauna.

Forest Proposed changes
Afforestation Only autochthonous species; Plants coming from “plants mothers” as much close as possible; Plantation sparse with clearing; Hole planting; Preferably ex cultivation land or degraded area
Allochthonous wood Forest assessment planning; Renaturation of unproductive wood; Sustainable forest harvesting
Autochthonous wood Forest assessment planning; Safeguards of the traditional techniques of use (conservation of coppices); Planning of conversion of coppices to high forest; Sustainable forest harvesting

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Tab. 8 - Some suggested changes for Sicilian agroecosystems management to reduce the impact on fauna (greenhouses and horticulture are excluded).

Agroecosystems Proposed changes
Cerealicolous Catch crops, intercropping; Rationalization of fertilization and tillage; Mechanical control of weeds (false sowing); Seed tanning with safe products
Citrus, Olive plantations, Vineyards, etc. Rationalization of fertilization and mechanization; Autumn-winter grassy; Green manure; Mechanical control of weeds; Biological and integrated control
Almond, Hazel, Carob groves (arboreal cultures to be neglected) Rationalization of fertilization; Autumn-winter grassy; Green manure; Mechanical control of weeds
Table wine Rationalization of fertilization; Autumn-winter grassy; Biological and integrated control with ecocompatible products
Pastoral Food diversification; Reduction of stock breeding

 Enlarge/Shrink  Open in Viewer

Besides the fact that the landscape is tied to the thousand-year history of the island, which in turn by itself encourages its conservation, there are also reasons correlated to the necessity of hydrogeologic and environmental protection.

Tab. 8 reports some changes here suggested, that could contribute to reduce the impact of Sicilian agriculture activities on fauna. It clearly appears that economical reasons make the enforcement of some of them difficult (e.g., cereal rotation with legumes), but a positive effect for the farmer will derive from the application of others. The hedgerow implantation, for example, also planned in the Rural Development Policy measures, is today considered largely effective in the agroecosystem management. Hedgerows play an important role as refuge and breeding site for vertebrate and invertebrate species, including many useful to agriculture (pollinators, predators and parasitoids - [5], [48], [44]). However, many of them, mainly those growing along rivers, even though playing the irreplaceable role of soil preservation, are largely decreasing, due to the abandonment process involving Sicilian agriculture ([45]). Uncontrolled and illegal burning, often associated with overgrazing exploitation, are indeed bringing about a slow and irreversible destruction of these valuable ecotonal habitats. Harvesting and stubble remotion take away nutrients stored within the plants and leave the soil completely uncovered and unprotected, thus suddenly modifying the microclimate, particularly the daily temperature variation. Repeated stubble burning causes decrease of phosphorous, nitrogen and organic matter in the first soil centimetres. Rotation practices, superficial ploughing (7-10 cm deep) and elimination of the stubble burning should result in a speed increase of the soil arthropod diversity and a decrease of damage to edge habitats and their fauna.

Finally, a possible reason generally overlooked, of the decline of some species, is the road network development that today allows to reach places once isolated. After the Unity of Italy, only 2500 km joined all the Sicilian villages and towns, and even in 1940-50 most rural roads were reachable only by riding a donkey. In the last decades road building increased considerably.


We are grateful to an anonymous referee for his advices and useful suggestions. We also thank M. S. Di Bella, who improved English language.


AA. VV. (2007). Atlante della biodiversità della Sicilia: Vertebrati terrestri. ARPA, Palermo (in press).
Google Scholar
Araùjo A, Bibier O (1997). White Stork Ciconia ciconia. In: (Hagemeijer EJM, Blair Mjeds) “The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance”. T & AD Poyser, London, UK.
Google Scholar
Azafzaf H (2002). Statut actuel de la population de la Cigogne blanche Ciconia ciconia en Tunisie. Alauda 70: 387-392.
Google Scholar
Baldock D, Beaufoy G, Bennett G, Clark J (1993). Nature conservation and new directions in the EC Common Agricultural Policy. IEEP, London, UK.
Google Scholar
Barbera G, La Mantia T (1991). I frangiventi nella frutticoltura integrata. Frutticoltura 7/8: 47-55.
Google Scholar
Beaufoy G, Baldock D, Clark J (1994). The nature of farming. Low intensity farming systems in nine European countries. IEEP, WWF and JNCC, UK.
Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2004). Birds in Europe. Population estimates, trends and conservation status (Burfield I, van Bommel F eds). BirdLife Int. Ser. No. 12, Cambridge, UK.
Google Scholar
Brullo S, Scelsi F, Siracusa G, Spampinato G (1996). Caratteristiche bioclimatiche della Sicilia. Giornale Botanico Italiano 130 (1): 177-185.
CrossRef | Google Scholar
Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C, Bonacquisti S, Scassellati E (2005). La flora vascolare italiana: ricchezza e originalità a livello nazionale e regionale. In: (Scoppola A, Blasi C eds) “Stato delle conoscenze sulla flora vascolare d’Italia”. Palombi & Partner s.r.l., Roma, pp. 18-22.
Google Scholar
Coppola E (1922). Studio sulle condizioni agricolo-zootecniche della zona dei latifondi siciliani. Castrogiovanni - Tipografia Eduardo Scandagliato, pp. 123.
Google Scholar
Corti C, Lo Cascio P (1999). I lacertidi italiani. L’Epos, Palermo.
Google Scholar
Cullotta S, Garfì G, La Mantia T, Marchetti M (2004). La Rete Ecologica siciliana: valore naturalistico delle aree protette e dei siti Natura 2000 e indicazioni per una gestione sostenibile. Naturalista sicil. 28: 509-531.
Google Scholar
Dixon J (1994). The potential role of agricultural policy for achieving nature conservation on farmland. In: (Bignal EM, McCracken DI, Curtis DJ eds) “Nature conservation and pastoralism in Europe”. INCC, Peterborough, pp. 110-116.
Google Scholar
Doderlein P (1874). Avifauna del Modenese e della Sicilia. Giorn. Sci. nat. econom. 5: 137-195; 6: 187-236; 7: 9-72; 8: 40-124; 9: 28-93; 10: 35-71, 133-148.
Google Scholar
Donald PF, Aebischer NJ (1997). The ecology and conservation of Corn Buntings Miliaria calandra. JNCC, Peterborough.
Google Scholar
Fierotti G (1988). Carta dei Suoli della Sicilia (scala 1:250.000). Palermo, Regione Siciliana, Ass. Territorio e Ambiente - Università degli Studi di Palermo, Facoltà di Agraria, Istituto di Agronomia Generale.
Google Scholar
Fornasari L, Violani C, Zava B (1997). I Chirotteri italiani. L’Epos edizioni, Palermo.
Google Scholar
Giglioli HE (1886). Avifauna italica. Le Monnier, Firenze.
Google Scholar
Grenci S, Massa A, Nobile V, Rizzo MC (1997). Importanza degli Imenotteri (Insecta Hymenoptera) nella dieta del Gruccione, Merops apiaster L. (Aves Meropidae). Naturalista sicil. 21: 287-307.
Google Scholar
Grove AT, Rackham O (2001). The nature of mediterranean Europe. An ecological history. Yale University Press, New Haven, USA.
Google Scholar
Heath M, Borggreve C, Peet N (2000). European bird populations: estimates and trends. BirdLife International Conservation Series n° 10.
Google Scholar
Heywood VH (1998). The Mediterranean region. A major centre of plant diversity. In: (Heywood VH, Skoula M eds) “Wild food and non-food plants: information networking”. Proceedings of the II MEDUSA Regional Workshop (1-3 may 1997, Port El-Kantaoui, Tunisia). Cahiers CIHEAM, Options Méditerranéennes 38: 5-15.
Google Scholar
Iapichino C, Massa B (1989). The Birds of Sicily. British Ornithologists’Union. Check-list n°11, London.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Barbera G (2003). Evoluzione del settore agroforestale e cambiamenti del paesaggio in Sicilia. In: (Lo Piccolo F, Schilleci F eds) “A Sud di Brobdingnag. L’identità dei luoghi: per uno sviluppo locale autosostenibile nella Sicilia occidentale”. Franco Angeli, Roma, pp. 118-150.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Cannella Z (2007). Alcuni dati storici sulla presenza dei grossi mammiferi in Sicilia. In: Atlante della biodiversità della Sicilia: vertebrati terrestri. ARPA, Palermo (in press).
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Pasta S (2001). La rinaturalizzazione dei rimboschimenti: proposte metodologiche e ipotesi di intervento nella Riserva Naturale “Grotta di Santa Ninfa”. Naturalista sicil. 25 (Suppl.): 299-323.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Pasta S (2005). The Sicilian phanerophytes: still a noteworthy patrimony, soon a lost resource? In: (Marchetti M ed) “Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe - from ideas to operationality”. IUFRO Conference, 15 November 2003, Firenze. EFI Proceedings 51: 515-526.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Pasta S (2007). Distribuzione pregressa ed estinzione della Foca monaca (Monachus monachus) in Sicilia (Carnivora Phocidae). In: “Atlante della biodiversità della Sicilia: Vertebrati terrestri”. ARPA, Palermo (in press).
Google Scholar
La Mantia T (1985). Averla capirossa (Lanius senator). In: Atlas Faunae Siciliae - Aves (Massa B red). Naturalista sicil. 10 (n° speciale): 174-175.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T (1997). Il ruolo degli elementi diversificatori negli agroecosistemi mediterranei: valorizzazione e relazioni con le popolazioni di vertebrati. Naturalista sicil. 22 (suppl.): 175-211.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T (2002). L’arboricoltura da legno nel paesaggio siciliano. Quaderni IAED 15: 135-153.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T (2004). Ecologia e agricoltura nel parco della Favorita. In Tenuta Reale “La favorita”. Fabio Orlando Editore, 89-122.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Veca DS, Gherardi L (1999). Chestnut woods on Madonie mountains (Sicily, Italy): reasons for abandonment and possibilities of recovery. Acta Horticulturae 494: 89-91.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Columba P, Scalzo G (2000). Considerazioni sull’applicazione del Regolamento CEE 2080/92 in Sicilia. Atti della Tavola Rotonda “Selvicoltura ed Arboricoltura da legno: quale gestione?”, Palermo 25 marzo 1999, Collana Sicilia Foreste 7: 89-106.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Spoto M, Massa B (2002). The colonisation of the Great Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides major L.) in Eucalypt woods and Poplar cultivations in Sicily. Ecologia Mediterranea 28: 65-73.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Pasta S, Giardina G, Marchetti M (2004). The effect of grazing in Forests: the case study of Ficuzza (W Sicily). International Congress: “Silvopastoralism and sustainable management”. Lugo (Spain), 18-24 Aprile 2004. Abstract book, pp. 195.
Google Scholar
La Mantia T, Oddo G, Rühl J, Furnari G, Scalenghe R (2007). Variazione degli stock di carbonio in seguito ai processi di abbandono dei coltivi: il caso studio dell’isola di Pantelleria (TP). Foresta@ 4 (1): 102-109.
CrossRef | Google Scholar
Lefranc N (1993). Les Pies-Grièches d’Europe, d’Afrique du Nord et du Moyen-Orient. Delachaux et Niestlé, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Google Scholar
Lilford L (1862). On the extinction in Europe of the Common Francolin (Francolinus vulgaris Steph.). Ibis Ser. 1 (4): 352-356.
Google Scholar
LIPU-WWF (1998). Lista rossa degli uccelli nidificanti in Italia (1988-1997) In: (Brichetti P, Gariboldi A eds) “Manuale Pratico di Ornitologia”. Edagricole, Bologna, vol. 2, pp. 67-121.
Google Scholar
Lo Valvo F (1998). Status e conservazione dell’erpetofauna siciliana. Naturalista sicil. 22: 53-71.
Google Scholar
Lo Valvo M, Massa B, Sarà M (1993). Uccelli e paesaggio in Sicilia alle soglie del terzo millennio. Naturalista sicil. 17 (suppl.): 1-373.
Google Scholar
Lo Valvo M, Barera A, Seminara S (1997). Biometria e status della Lepre appenninica (Lepus corsicanus, de Winton 1898) in Sicilia. Naturalista sicil. 21: 67-74.
Google Scholar
Lo Verde G, Perricone G, La Mantia T (2002). L’azione di differenti tipi di frangiventi sull’artropodofauna e sulle caratteristiche bioagronomiche di un aranceto nel territorio di Menfi (AG). Italia Forestale e Montana 4: 390-408.
Google Scholar
Marchetti M, La Mantia T, Messana G, Barbera G (2002). Il significato dei popolamenti arborei ed arbustivi fuori foresta nel paesaggio agrario e la loro dinamica evolutiva in due aree campione della Sicilia. Italia Forestale e Montana 4: 369-389.
Google Scholar
Marsili L, Massi A (1991). Contaminazione da organoclorurati in due Capovaccai trovati morti in Sicilia. Riv. ital. Orn. 61: 77-79.
Google Scholar
Mascara R, Sarà M (2007). Censimento di specie d’uccelli steppico-cerealicole d’interesse comunitario nella piana di Gela (Sicilia sud-orientale) (Aves). Naturalista sicil. 31: 27-39.
Google Scholar
Massa B, La Mantia T (1997). Benefits of hedgerows-windbreaks for birds and their valorisation in sustainable agriculture. Agricoltura Mediterranea 127: 332-341.
Google Scholar
Massa B, Lo Verde G (2007). L’Arvicola del Savi, Microtus savii (De Sélys Longchamps), in agrumeti e vigneti siciliani. Informatore fitopatologico 57 (9): 23-26.
Google Scholar
Massa B, Rizzo MC (2002). Nesting and feeding habits of the European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster L.) in a colony next to a beekeeping site. Avocetta 26: 25-31.
Google Scholar
Massa B (1972). La Foca monaca (Monachus monachus Herm.) esiste ancora in Sicilia. Atti Soc. ital. Sc. nat. Mus. civ. St. nat. Milano 113: 385-390.
Google Scholar
Massa B (1973). L’Avifauna estiva degli arcipelaghi delle Egadi e dello Stagnone (Trapani, Sicilia). Atti Accad. Gioenia Sc. nat. Catania 5: 63-95.
Google Scholar
Massa B (1980). Ricerche sui rapaci in un’area-campione della Sicilia. Naturalista sicil. 4: 59-72.
Google Scholar
Massa B (1985). Atlas Faunae Siciliae. Aves. Naturalista sicil. 9: 1-274 (special issue).
Google Scholar
Massa B, Valvo F, Margagliotta B, Valvo M (2004). Adaptive plasticity of blue tits (Parus caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major) breeding in natural and semi-natural insular habitats. Ital. J. Zool. 71: 209-217.
Google Scholar
Massi A, Marsili L, Focardi S, Leonzio C, Cortone P (1990). Contaminazione da metalli in tracce ed idrocarburi clorurati in tessuti di Capovaccaio, Neophron percnopterus. Riv. Ital. Orn. 60 (1-2): 29-36.
Google Scholar
Minà-Palumbo F (1853). Catalogo degli Uccelli delle Madonie. I. Atti Accad. Sc. Lett. Arti Palermo, 2: 1-32; II. Atti Accad. Sc. Lett. Arti Palermo 3: 1-45.
Google Scholar
Morici F (1940). Aspetti e risulati tecnici-economici di imprese pastorali siciliane. Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria, Osservatorio di Economia Agraria per la Sicilia, Studi e Monografie, Serie prima 2: 84.
Google Scholar
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAA, Kent J (2000). Biodiversity hot-spots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
CrossRef | Google Scholar
Médail F, Quézel P (1997). Hot-Spots analysis for conservation of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean basin. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 112-127.
CrossRef | Google Scholar
Orlando C (1956). I Picini (sottofamiglia Picinae) in Sicilia. Riv. ital. Orn. 26: 78-81.
Google Scholar
Orlando C (1958a). La Quaglia tridattila Turnix sylvatica (Desf.). Venatoria sicula 12: 342-344.
Google Scholar
Orlando C (1958b). Il Basettino Panurus biarmicus (L.). Venatoria sicula 12: 298.
Google Scholar
Palumbo G (1997). Il Grillaio. Altrimedia, Matera, pp. 142.
Google Scholar
Pasta S, La Mantia T (2001a). L’impatto dell’attività agricola e la gestione delle aree protette: il caso della Riserva Naturale “Maccalube di Aragona”. Naturalista sicil. 25 (Suppl.): 197-215.
Google Scholar
Pasta S, La Mantia T (2001b). Note sul paesaggio vegetale delle isole minori circumsiciliane. I. Consorzi forestali e preforestali dell’Isola di Lampedusa (AG) ed effetto degli impianti artificiali sulla vegetazione naturale. Naturalista sicil. 25 (Suppl.): 71-89.
Google Scholar
Patti M (1845). Osservazioni e descrizioni ornitologiche. Atti Accad. Gioenia Sc. nat. Catania 2: 321-335.
Google Scholar
Priolo A (1954). Quadro sinottico delle osservazioni ornitologiche svolte in Sicilia dal 1940 al 1953. Avocetta 1: 1-13.
Google Scholar
Priolo A (1967). Distrutti i Grifoni delle Caronie? Riv. ital. Orn. 37: 7-11.
Google Scholar
Rainio K, Laaksonen T, Ahola M, Vähätalo AV, Lehikoinen E (2006). Climatic responses in spring migration of boreal and arctic birds in relation to wintering area and taxonomy. J. Avian Biol. 37: 507-515.
Google Scholar
Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003). Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60.
CrossRef | Google Scholar
Ryszkowski L, Karg J, Margarit G, Paoletti MG, Zlotin R (1993). Above-ground insect biomass in agricultural landscapes of Europe. In: (Bunce RGH, Ryszkowski L, Paoletti MG eds) “Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems”. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, pp. 71-82.
Google Scholar
Sarà M (1998). I Mammiferi delle isole del Mediterraneo. L’Epos edizioni, Palermo.
Google Scholar
Sarà M (1999). Il “Catalogo dei Mammiferi della Sicilia” rivisitato. Soc. messinese di Storia Patria, Messina.
Google Scholar
Sarà M, Siracusa M, Ciaccio A (1987). Estinzione del Gufo reale, Bubo bubo, in Sicilia. Riv. Ital. Orn. 57: 50-56.
Google Scholar
Sciortino M (2003). La sensibilità alla desertificazione della Regione Sicilia. In: “La risposta al cambiamento climatico in Italia”. ENEA, pp. 31-39.
Google Scholar
Smith D (1968). A history of Sicily. Medieval Sicily: 800-1713. Modern Sicily: after 1713. Chatto and Windus, London.
Google Scholar
Stervander M, Jonzén N, Andersson A (2005). Timing of spring migration in birds: long-term trends, North Atlantic Oscillation and the significance of different migration routes. J. Avian Biol. 36: 210-221.
Google Scholar
Stresemann E (1943). Die Brutvogel des Sees von Lentini, Sizilien. Orn. Monabster 51: 116-122.
Google Scholar
Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira M, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145-148.
CrossRef | Google Scholar
Trischitta A (1919). Sull’esistenza del picchio nero (Dryocopus martius (L.)) in Sicilia. Boll. Ist. Zool. R. Univ. Palermo 1: 77-80.
Google Scholar
Trocchi V, Riga F (2001). Piano d’azione nazionale per la lepre italica (Lepus corsicanus). Quaderni di conservazione della natura 9, pp. 102.
Google Scholar
Tucker GM, Heath MF (1994). Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife Int., Cambridge, UK.
Google Scholar
Turrisi GF, Vaccaro A (2001). Distribuzione altitudinale di Anfibi e Rettili sul Monte Etna (Sicilia orientale). Pianura 13: 335-338.
Google Scholar
Violani CG, Massa B (1993). Extinction of the Andalusian Hemipode Turnix s. sylvatica (Desf.) in the Mediterranean region. Bull. Br. Orn. Cl. 113: 225-229.
Google Scholar



This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info